Technology and Literacy
Showing posts with label Educational Perspectives. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Educational Perspectives. Show all posts
Monday, November 19, 2012
Thursday, November 8, 2012
The Trouble with AR (Accelerated Reader)
My concern about the AR program has grown in the past few years. Accelerated Reader is book reading incentive program that claims to motivate readers of all levels. This is a computer based literacy program our schools us, in which my sons attend and both schools have adopted this program and use it to exhaustion. The makers of the program claim that by leveling children they will have more success and therefore embrace reading faster thereby increasing achievement levels. I have found that although this program can help to motivate a reluctant reader by guiding them towards books that will hopefully find success in reading; it is limiting and I don't feel as though my children think of the literature they have read in meaningful ways.
For example: I recently read The Giver by Lowis Lowry to my fifth and seventh grade boys. They enjoyed the story but as I asked questions throughout the chapters their answers were low level. They were "thinking" about the concepts or symbols in the book. Mostly they wanted to understand who the characters were and what they did in order to answer the questions correctly on the AR quiz. What a shame. At that point I slowed it down and turned it into a project at home and forced them to dig deeper and find meaning in the story. They objected at first (because it was not required by school) but eventually complied with my requests. We began to have deeper conversations about what it would be like in a world filled with "sameness". I found them discussing the different situations on the car ride to soccer and debating over their own perspectives on the positives and negatives of the story line. I don't feel as though I pushed them to hard, just enough to cross the line into a state of higher order thinking.
At this time my seventh grader has an assignment to read and test on a biography. He has looked and I have looked for books that he is interested in that are in his "level". This has been a challenge to say the least. I wish an exception could be made throughout the reading program to allow students to read books and possibly do an old fashioned book report! I don't think my boys have ever done one. The confines in which their reading education is held are too stringent and according to research done by Mallette, Henk and Melnick at Marquette University the data used to substantiate the AR programs' claims are less than solid. They are not the only researchers to come to this conclusion. I believe we, as an educated population, must allow our teachers some control in their own classrooms. It is important to individualize education and not only teach reading to improve achievement levels but to instill a love for reading for life.
In my opinion systems and programs are good to create a solid structure but the creativity and individualization of design must be fostered as well to create a high level education.
Monday, October 29, 2012
Point of view in nonfiction picture books | Page by Page by Maria Salvadore | Blogs about Reading | Reading Rockets
Point of view in nonfiction picture books | Page by Page by Maria Salvadore | Blogs about Reading | Reading Rockets
This is a glimpse into a very interesting debate. Salvadore suggests that the battle between fiction and non-fiction should not exist because there will always be an authors perspective imbedded into even the most well-researched book. In the article she presents an example of a picture book called When Marian Sang: The True Recital of Marian Anderson written by Pam Munoz Ryan which she believed would help to support the Common Core Standards. The teachers she presented the material groaned that it was more like a picture book and it looked more like fiction than non-fiction.
I believe the point that Salvadore is making is valid because all writers have their own perspective and style of writing. The words which they choose reveal their points of view even illustrators can portray people and situations in ways which touch our collective souls. It is important to teach students to listen and decipher the various voices that reside in our non-fiction resources. Finding the balance between fiction and non-fiction will serve to propel students understanding of the writing process in greater ways. There are enough battles waging in our society why pit two important genres of literature against each other. Finding ways to intertwine knowledge will only make our students stronger.
This is a glimpse into a very interesting debate. Salvadore suggests that the battle between fiction and non-fiction should not exist because there will always be an authors perspective imbedded into even the most well-researched book. In the article she presents an example of a picture book called When Marian Sang: The True Recital of Marian Anderson written by Pam Munoz Ryan which she believed would help to support the Common Core Standards. The teachers she presented the material groaned that it was more like a picture book and it looked more like fiction than non-fiction.
I believe the point that Salvadore is making is valid because all writers have their own perspective and style of writing. The words which they choose reveal their points of view even illustrators can portray people and situations in ways which touch our collective souls. It is important to teach students to listen and decipher the various voices that reside in our non-fiction resources. Finding the balance between fiction and non-fiction will serve to propel students understanding of the writing process in greater ways. There are enough battles waging in our society why pit two important genres of literature against each other. Finding ways to intertwine knowledge will only make our students stronger.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)