Wednesday, June 10, 2015

Review of Research in Media Literacies

A Review of Research in Media Literacies


The internet has the capacity to alter the nature of literacy itself. Digital Literacy as defined by Wikipedia, I know that the most reliable source, but since we are breaking down barriers and defining new "definitions" I offer this definition as a starting point.
Digital literacy is the knowledge, skills, and behaviors used in a broad range of digital devices such as smartphones, tablets, laptops and desktop PCs, all of which are seen as network rather than computing devices. Digital literacy initially focused on digital skills and stand-alone computers, but the focus has moved from stand-alone to network devices. 

1. Overview- What did I learn?

There is a great deal of flexibility and interpretation when it comes to defining or explaining a new literacy. I hadn’t thought of social sites,  likes blogs and twitter as new forms of literacy but it is clear they are beginning to break barriers and contain their own set of rules. It is clear that the area of "new literacy" will continue to grow as new programs, apps and sites are created. We don't even know the potential, ramifications or rules to navigate this new frontier. I found that research papers from 2012 were in conflict with reports and research produced in 2014 a sign to suggest how quickly the landscape of literacy is changing. Flexibility and open-mindedness will be the most important aspects of education. 





2. Perceptions of strengths and weaknesses- Judging the quality of the research

 The connections that are made through new literacies are boundless. Forums, blogs, internet and social gaming allow people to connect in meaningful ways despite physical location, status, educational levels or traditional barriers. This has the potential to create incredible synergies for a merging of ideas, research and connectedness in a way that hasn’t been possible before. Most of the research I found suggested that technology and forms of new literacy will strengthen students performance. According to Knobel & Lankshear 2014 the challenge comes preparing students in a world in which very few constant footholds exist. This leads me to believe the landscape of literacy is changing so quickly the reports and research done is quickly outdated or rendered useless because of the inherent nature of the subject. Researchers like Shaw 2014 suggest such a powerful connection between the visual arts and writing that technology presents a method for breaking down barriers including those of language for ESL students.

These students in which Shaw refers are caught in the midst of the digital divide. I have included a TED talk video regarding the digital divide and the implications of technology among communities.

Aleph Molinari- Speaks about empowering the digitally excluded to conquer the digital divide. By creating this model of creating content, designing training, analyzing user patterns and ultimately improving content he and his team have developed an effective way of closing the gap.

According to Coiro, Knobel, Lankshear, & Leu, 2010 new literacies will continue to challenge law makers and policy makers. They site that states are accountable for raising reading achievement, using tests as a measure of accountability. Common Core is a nationwide initiative to secure higher achievement levels for all students but these tests do not account for online comprehension or a students ability to navigate the digital world. They found that there is a difference between a students ability to read and understand information on the internet and digitally verses that of traditional texts. I agree that 



The Digital Divide







3. Implications- Suggestions for future research or classroom use

How can we incorporate research studies into a classroom in which the rules of engagement are constantly changing? How do we teach new and experienced teachers to embrace technology without sacrificing rigor and methodology?  Allowing students to define their roles and giving opportunities to share knowledge, ideas, creative thoughts will bring teachers into a new territory. There are dangers that lurk in the recesses of the black hole we call the net. How can we balance the new literacies with the old? How do we get students to think and create and share in meaningful ways utilizing technology? Research has shown a great deal of opportunity for using technology but I have found it difficult to get my students to control themselves. Self-regulation and willpower are shrinking in a fast paced, let me look up the answer on my phone world. 



According to Coiro, Knobel, Lankshear, & Leu, 2010 new literacies will continue to challenge law makers and policy makers. They site that states are accountable for raising reading achievement, using tests as a measure of accountability. Common Core is a nationwide initiative to secure higher achievement levels for all students but these tests do not account for online comprehension or a students ability to navigate the digital world. They found that there is a difference between a students ability to read and understand information on the internet and digitally verses that of traditional texts. 

We are bearing witness to new cultures, languages, rules and communities that are created virtually. Research is beginning to show that blogs, closed Facebook groups, online gaming communities and Twitter and connecting people that may not have been connected in a real life situation, meaning the breaking down of social constraints and barriers. These "new literacies" are communes creating an alternative to the regular work spaces or play spaces we have seen in the past. 
New languages are emerging and, as a woman over 40 years of age,I can honestly admit that I am challenged by the lack of syntax and phonetic structure that many of these "new literacies" incorporates. I want my students to feel comfortable and share ideas effectively utilizing technology, not just for technology sake, but to enhance their message or ideas. 



Works Cited

Coiro, J., Knobel, M., Lankshear, C., & Leu, D. J. (2010). Central Issues in New Literacies and New Literacies Research. In J. Coiro, M. Knobel, C. Lankshear, & D. J. Leu, Handbook of Research on New Literacies (pp. 1-21). New York, New York: Taylor & Francis.
Costley, K. C. (2014). The Positive Effects of Technology on Teaching and Student Learning. Arkansas Tech University.
(2008). Vision for Learning: History, Theory, and Affirmation. In S. B. Heath, & R. Wollach, Handbook of Research on Teaching literacy through the communicative and visual arts (pp. 3-11). New York, New York: International Reading Association.
Knobel, M., & Lankshear, C. (2014, October). Studying New Literacies. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy , 98-104.
Shaw, L. J. (2014). Breaking with Tradition: Multimodal Literacy Learning. New England Reading Association , 19-26.






No comments:

Post a Comment